Monday, September 14, 2009

Brad Scott Isn't Getting The Job Done

By The Avenue of Champions

Scott built-up reputation as one of the finest offensive line coaches in the country working for Bobby Bowden at FSU from 1987-1993 during a time when the Seminoles made it look easy on the field. The Seminoles embarrassed every team in the ACC in 1992 and 1993.

Scott used the Seminoles 1993 National Championship to springboard into the HC position at University of South Carolina in 1994 and led the Gamecocks to a 7-6 record and a Carquest Bowl victory in his first season. The success was short lived as South Carolina went an embarrassing 1-10 in 1998 and Scott was subsequently fired. Scott’s tenure laid the groundwork for a record 21 consecutive losses that showed an obvious inability to find, develop and coach-up talent.

Photobucket

Brad Scott Laying The Foundation For 21 Straight Losses.

Tommy Bowden brought Scott to Clemson as a position coach and after moving from TE to OC, Scott ultimately found himself in charge of the offensive line at Clemson in 2004. In Clemson first year under Scott, Clemson rolled out a starting unit of Jesse Pickens, Cedric Johnson, Tommy Sharp, Nathan Bennett and Marion Dukes to start the season and looked absolutely terrible culminating in a humiliating performance by the OL in College Station against Texas A&M. People questioned Scott for starting a walk-on at OT and OC and eventually Barry Richardson replaced Pickens and the line improved a little as the year progressed.

In 2005, Clemson returned 3 starters in Richardson, Bennett and Dukes and replaced the undersized Sharp with Dustin Fry a player that most pundits thought should have started over Sharp in 2004. The line showed improvement from the previous year buoyed by to naturally tough guards in Nathan Bennett and Roman Fry and by the end of the season was a pretty good unit overall.

In 2006, Clemson returned all 5 starters and not surprisingly for a team with 100s of starts combined played very well through the GT game until Roman Fry went down with an injury against GT and the lack of depth at OG caused the line play to suffer tremendously.

In 2007, Clemson had to replace the entire line with new starters with the exception of Barry Richardson who was basically the same player in 2004 as in 2007 after showing little improvement under Scott. The line struggled against average defensive teams and showed marginal improvement as the season progressed.

In 2008, Clemson faced a multitude of injuries and ended up starting a different starting five almost every game for the entire season. The only thing consistent with the line in 2008 was that they were consistently terrible and showed little improvement as the season progressed.

In 2009, Clemson returned every player on the two-deep with the exception of Bobby Hutchinson and thus far the line has been the weakest link on the team struggling with the less than imposing front-fours of MTSU and GT.

Clemson doesn’t have the luxury of hand-picking Rivals100 talent like Scott did at FSU during the late 80s and early 90s and thus has to rely heavily on Scott’s scouting ability to find diamonds in the rough and Scott’s coaching skills to develop them into talented football players.

Here is a look at the players Scott has hand-selected as offensive line coach.

2005
Thomas Austin – Solid player
Jamarcus Grant - Bust
Barry Humpries - Bust
Cory Lambert – The Matador
Quentez Ruffin - Bust

2006
Jamal Medlin - Bust
Chris Hairston - Solid Player

2007
Mason Cloy – Solid Player
Wilson Norris - Incomplete
David Smith – Back-up
Landon Walker – Back-up behind The Matador (now starting)

Scott has landed 3 players out of our SR, JR and SO on this team that can be considered solid players and all but 1 of the under-the-radar players (Hairston) that Scott has landed have been busts. Even the 4-Star recruits that had a grab bag of offers coming out of High School like Lambert and Walker have underachieved and failed to live up to their potential under Scott.

The lack of depth is also a constant issue with the team. The offensive line is always one injury away from catastrophe. Catastrophe that was realized when Roman Fry went down in 2006 and was realized last year when the OL had a couple of players rotating on and off the trainers table. Of course it doesn’t help that seemingly every OT that Scott recruits ends up being better suited for OG, which leaves us without options at OT and somehow also thin at OG.

Scott is a great person, is a outstanding communicator with high school coaches and was a very good recruiter to boot but in recent years hasn’t recruited with the level of effort required, but as far as evaluating talent and coaching-up talent Scott fails to measure up to his peers. Scott’s lines consistently lack toughness, consistently fail to open up holes in the running game and consistently allow pressure on the QB in passing situations. The players deserve better. The players deserve a coach that is going to coach them up. The players deserve coach that is going to maximize their ability and a coach that is going to get them to the NFL.

Sadly the players are getting none of that under Scott’s watch.

Hopefully that will change in 2010.

12 comments:

  1. I am praying Robbie Caldwell in 2010.

    Great Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I couldn't disagree more. Our problems on offensive line have been caused by poor offensive philosophy. Was it Scott's fault that the guys couldn't get in a 3 point stance until half way through last year? Was it Scott's fault that every two years we changed offensive philosophies to the latest Tommy Bowden Fun 'N Punt gimmick offense? How do you expect an offensive line to open up holes in the running game when all they practice is screen plays and reverses? Seriously.

    Of all the things to complain about with Clemson football for the last 10 years, Brad Scott was the least of the problems. I'm not saying he's the best coach ever, but come on.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First, the OL is the hardest position to recruit and develop on the team.

    Second, DANNY PEARMAN now coaches the OTs.

    Third, the interior OL is now the strength of the team. Who coaches them? Oh right, Scott.

    as far as recruits, what about McClain? The Fry guys? Nathan Bennett?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Robert,

    Brad Scott coaches the entire line and Danny Pearman is primarily a second set of eyes on the OT position.

    The interior OL in not a strength of this team in my opinion or any any peoples opinion that wrote this blog. It is better than the OT, but is far from a strength.

    The Fry's and Bennett were recruited by West not Scott and West's OL were much better than Scott's by and large.



    McLain was

    ReplyDelete
  5. Isn't it a little early to consider Wilson Norris a bust? He's second string behind the best player on the line. It's his redshirt sophmore season, and his redshirt time almost didn't count because of a knee injury. In two years if he still hasn't seen the field or has seen the field and been horrible I'll agree, but so far he hasn't really had a fair shot to be a bust or a success.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No need to call out RS SO as busts... You ruin good arguments with personal attacks on the kids in my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Joe,

    Perhaps we were a little harsh on Norris to label him a bust as a rSO.

    We struggled with how to label him, but in the end decided that because Norris is 3rd is the back-up rotation on the inside behind Dalton Freeman (rFR) and David Smith (rSO) and based on some feedback that we received from inside the program that indiciated in all likelihood Norris will be a career back-up that it was safe to label him a bust.

    Hopefully we are wrong here. We likely would have been wrong on Chris Capote.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Can't say that i disagree, I wrote a similar post on my own blog.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This blog is retarded and in no way benefits Clemson Football

    ReplyDelete
  10. THAT'S WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT, BOY!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. You guys actually just earned a lot of respect from me for changing Wilson Norris' status to incomplete. Being willing to maintain an open mind even in the face of what even I will admit is pretty strong evidence of your being right is a great way to handle yourselves. I'll be reading from now on. Good luck guys.

    ReplyDelete
  12. why does one of the ads on your site say "University Of Clemson Tigers." don't you guys know that it is "Clemson University." You lost all credibility with me after I saw that. You obviously hasn't been around the area that long if that's what you call our school.

    ReplyDelete