The blame for the poor start to the season rests at the feet of the Boston College offense, which has been abysmal to date. Boston College ranks last in the ACC in rushing offense, total offense and scoring offense on top of coughing the ball up over two times per game. A lot of their problems stem from a lack of an answer at the quarterback position, which has shuffled between Dave Shinskie and Mike Mascovetra before settling on freshman, Chase Rettig. Boston College has a talented back in Montel Harris, who backed-up Jamie Harper in High School, along with some solid pieces along the offensive line lead by OT Anthony Costanzo, but opposing defenses have stacked the box and BC's hasn't been able to beat team with the pass.
Boston College | 2009 | 2010 | NET +/- | '10 NCAA Rank | 10' ACC Rank | >
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rushing Offense | 136.92 | 102.29 | -34.63 | 105 | 12 | >
Passing Offense | 187.00 | 191.86 | 4.86 | 79 | 8 | >
Total Offense | 323.92 | 294.15 | -29.77 | 112 | 12 | >
Scoring Offense | 24.77 | 19.14 | -5.63 | 104 | 12 | >
TOP | 29:05 | 27.39 | 1:24 | 109 | 12 | >
TO Per Game | 2.00 | 2.29 | .29 | > |
The Tigers head to Chesnutt Hill with at 4-3 (2-2) mark. Offensively the Tiger's have struggled for much of the season to find an offensive identity. The Tiger's did manage to break out of the funk against a below-average Georgia Tech defense last week putting up 403 yards and 27 points.
The most encouraging aspect of their performance was the continued emergence of the wide receivers lead by freshman Nuke Hopkins and sophomore Jaron Brown who combined for 7 catches and 87 yards. Most importantly the group didn't have a single drop and match some tough catches for big chunks of yardage and to extend drives.
The passing game will need to continue its maturation this week as the Tiger's face a much stingier defense that specialize in taking away the run. The Tigers should still lean on their strength running the football with Andre Ellington, but the offense is going to have to be efficient in the passing game to put up points against the maroon and gold.
Clemson | 2009 | 2010 | NET +/- | '10 NCAA Rank | 10' ACC Rank | >
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rushing Offense | 170.36 | 175.43 | 5.07 | 40 | 5 | >
Passing Offense | 192.00 | 178.14 | -13.86 | 72 | 10 | >
Total Offense | 362.36 | 353.57 | -8.79 | 73 | 10 | >
Scoring Offense | 31.14 | 30.29 | -0.85 | 47 | 4 | >
TOP | 28:04 | 28:38 | 0:34 | 90 | 8 | >
TO Per Game | 1.71 | 1.14 | -0.57 | > |
Boston College puts a defense on the field that is in the same mold as the last few defenses the Eagles have fielded. They stuff the run well and feature studs at linebacker, while being mediocre in the secondary. Luke Kuechly is a cyborg and one of the most underrated players in the country. The Eagles have given up more points this year, but a lot of that is simple due to an anemic offense putting them in poor positions defensively.
Overall the Eagles have a defense that is one of the toughest the Tigers have faced to date. I would put them right behind Miami, but BC is starting to get hit hard with injuries. Alex Albright (DE), Wes Davis (S) and DeLeon Gause (CB) all are unlikely to play on Saturday, so the Eagle defense is not going to be quite as strong as it was earlier this season.
Boston College | 2009 | 2010 | NET +/- | '10 NCAA Rank | 10' ACC Rank | >
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rushing Defense | 103.15 | 83.57 | -19.58 | 4 | 1 | >
Passing Defense | 224.46 | 230.57 | -6.11 | 80 | 10 | >
Total Defense | 327.61 | 314.14 | -13.47 | 22 | 3 | >
Scoring Defense | 19.77 | 25.00 | 5.33 | 65 | 10 | >
TO Per Game | 1.77 | 2.57 | 0.80 | > |
The Tigers defense is trending in the right direction after getting off to a bit of a slow start defensively to start the season. Steele was finally able to slow down the Yellow Jacket offense under Paul Johnson limiting them to 13 points.
This week the Tigers should have a field day against the Boston College offense that has been pitiful to date. The Tiger's should focus on taking away Montel Harris and make Rettig beat them with the pass. I can see a repeat of last year where the Tiger's utterly dominated BC in the Valley. As bad as BC offense was last year this year’s version is worse.
Clemson | 2009 | 2010 | NET +/- | '10 NCAA Rank | 10' ACC Rank | >
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rushing Defense | 151.50 | 157.43 | 5.93 | 70 | 7 | >
Passing Defense | 162.79 | 195.57 | 32.78 | 36 | 5 | >
Total Defense | 314.29 | 353.00 | 38.17 | 51 | 8 | >
Scoring Defense | 20.43 | 18.43 | -2.00 | 22 | 3 | >
TO Per Game | 2.14 | 1.85 | 0.29 | > |
Closing Thoughts
There really isn't a whole lot to say about this game. Boston College is bad. Clemson has more talent at every position outside of linebacker. Clemson should roll. It is really that simple.
My key to the game is Clemson not turning the ball over. Florida State turning the ball over and spotting Boston College good field position and points is the only reason BC was in the game at FSU and that should hold true against Clemson. Hold onto the ball and Clemson wins going away.
This is a game that the Tigers should win easily and not cover the spread in my opinion is signs of a poor performance. I definitely would take the Tigers and give the points.
No comments:
Post a Comment